Re: Bug mass filling
* Aurelien Jarno (aurelien@aurel32.net) [061019 21:31]:
> Andreas Barth a écrit :
> >A violation of the parts of the debian policy as listed on
> >http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt is serious level (that
> >should be the same as the must-directives in policy, but - well, I hope
> >that I have finally time post-etch to sync that finally).
> >
> >Any other policy violation is at most important level (unless it
> >conincides with one of the other criteria for RC bugs, of course).
> >
>
> Note that what we are discussing (must have in targets debian/rules) are
> listed on http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt
As vorlon said, that is listed under the heading of "4. Autobuilding",
so the scope is "buildds must not fail" of this rule. That is why I
asked to file the cases where buildds failed as serious, and the others
as important (and cases where "Packages in the archive must not be so
buggy [...] we refuse to support them." as serious as well, that is
under section "5. General").
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
Reply to: