Re: Bug mass filling
* Mike Hommey (email@example.com) [061019 21:14]:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 09:06:42PM +0200, Andreas Barth <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > * Mike Hommey (email@example.com) [061019 20:42]:
> > > Note how subtly the Etch RC policy removes the first alternative of the
> > > serious bug description...
> > Which do you mean? Please read the Etch RC policy. It tells:
> > | In addition to the issues listed in this document, an issue is release
> > | critical if it:
> > | [...]
> > | * in the maintainer's opinion, makes the package unsuitable
> > | for release
> > So, what does the Etch RC policy remove from the bugs.d.o description?
> 'is a severe violation of Debian policy (roughly, it violates a "must" or
> "required" directive), or'
The html-code for this part is:
<DD>is a <a href="http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt">severe
violation of Debian policy</a> (roughly, it violates a "must" or "required"
directive), or, in the package maintainer's opinion, makes the package
unsuitable for release.
So, obviously http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities defines
that "severe violation of Debian policy" means anything referenced in