Re: Will IceWeasel be based on a fork or on vanilla FireFox?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Will IceWeasel be based on a fork or on vanilla FireFox?
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:26:21 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20061016132621.GE14633@kitenet.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20061016094135.15040.qmail@web52606.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <[🔎] 20061016094135.15040.qmail@web52606.mail.yahoo.com>

Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> PS: Can't we just rename it '93r8d9yad4l260ud.lite'? It's easier to remember!

I prefer d6a5c9544eca9b5ce2266d1c34a93222, or possibly
acb943ac7d07d80a71fa271962df81e944bae3b7.

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Will IceWeasel be based on a fork or on vanilla FireFox?
  - From: Jérôme Marant <jerome@marant.org>

References:
- Re: Will IceWeasel be based on a fork or on vanilla FireFox?
  - From: Ottavio Caruso <pr0f3ss0r1492@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Mass-filing RC bugs about IETF RFC license based on file name (Was: Bug#393411: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's)
Next by Date: safe halt/reboot/shutdown
Previous by thread: Re: Will IceWeasel be based on a fork or on vanilla FireFox?
Next by thread: Re: Will IceWeasel be based on a fork or on vanilla FireFox?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread