Hi, On Saturday 14 October 2006 12:51, Wookey wrote: > Nevertheless I think it is clear that we do need mechanisms to keep > the load and package set appropriate for slower arches. If we design > the mechanism properly I would hope it could be useful for various > categorisation/subsetting purposes within debian. Isn't it up to the maintainer to say $package is not suited for $architecture? And aren't maintainers happy to receive hints (e.g. from porters or users of a certain package), which specific package is not suited for a specific architecture? regards, Holger
Attachment:
pgpi8ndTcLQEM.pgp
Description: PGP signature