Re: How should we deal with 'pointless-on-this-arch' packages?

To: Toni Mueller <toni@debian.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Wookey <wookey@aleph1.co.uk>
Subject: Re: How should we deal with 'pointless-on-this-arch' packages?
From: Ingo Juergensmann <ij@2006.bluespice.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 18:44:25 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20061014164425.GA8667@2004.bluespice.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20061014102135.11511.qmail@oak.oeko.net>
References: <[🔎] 20061014013014.GB30151@xios> <[🔎] 20061014100619.GC20396@2004.bluespice.org> <[🔎] 20061014102135.11511.qmail@oak.oeko.net>

On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 12:21:35PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:

> I agree with most of what Wookey and you said, but would like some
> clarification on this:
> On Sat, 14.10.2006 at 12:06:20 +0200, Ingo Juergensmann <ij@2006.bluespice.org> wrote:
> > But sadly, I have very little hope that Debian will change anything it's
> > release structure soon. *sigh* 

What do you want to hear? What clarification do you need?
I think it is known that some changes in Debian needs a loooong time. Adding
amd64 to the archive is an example. 

-- 
Ciao...                //        Fon: 0381-2744150 
      Ingo           \X/         SIP: 2744150@sipgate.de

gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij/public_key.asc

Reply to:

References:
- How should we deal with 'pointless-on-this-arch' packages?
  - From: Wookey <wookey@aleph1.co.uk>
- Re: How should we deal with 'pointless-on-this-arch' packages?
  - From: Ingo Juergensmann <ij@2006.bluespice.org>
- Re: How should we deal with 'pointless-on-this-arch' packages?
  - From: Toni Mueller <toni@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: How should we deal with 'pointless-on-this-arch' packages?
Next by Date: Re: How should we deal with 'pointless-on-this-arch' packages?
Previous by thread: Re: How should we deal with 'pointless-on-this-arch' packages?
Next by thread: Re: How should we deal with 'pointless-on-this-arch' packages?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread