Re: Orphaning my packages
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 06:13:23PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> > I'll take ssss since it hasn't been claimed.
> I claimes it via ITA straight away, perhaps I should have emailed the
> list as well sorry.
No problem, it was my fault for trusting the mail and not checking.
> I'm always happy for co-maintenance, or you can take it yourself.
> I imagine it will be easy to maintain. I also maintain another package
> by the same author, and he is great to work with.
Great. It sounds like you'd be the best choice for it then.
I would offer to comaintain, since I think that is generally a good
thing, but for a slow-moving package like this I'm not sure that it
is required.
> I was wondering what the upload ettiquete should be. There is no now,
> version, no bugs, and the packaging is fine. Do I try and find a sponsor
> just for a change of maintainer, or do I wait until there is something
> to do?
You could upload now to fix the standards version and to set the
new maintainer - thats what I'd do, even though there are no bugs
or newer upstream available.
Steve
--
Reply to: