[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Request to mailing list Pkg-qof-maintainers rejected



On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 02:26:52PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-09-10 at 11:48 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > > has been rejected by the list moderator.  The moderator gave the
> > > following reason for rejecting your request:

> > > "No reason given"

> > Any maintainer doing such a braindead stupid thing - do not wonder if I
> > reject your package without any comment in the future.
> > The maintainer address has to be open to receive mail. It is fucking
> > annyoing already that the damn "Your post needs a moderator" messages
> > get back, rejecting legal mail is even worse.

> Surely, you've *never* pressed or clicked the wrong button.

> It would really help if people assumed that their fellow developers are
> in good faith, and that something that seems unacceptable is just an
> honest mistake until proven otherwise. Like this, or like the "BTS wars"
> mails also of today.

For my part, I find it pretty offensive that a mailing list that's set as
the maintainer of a package would have mail filters configured this way in
the first place.  For the samba packaging team, for instance, I've taken
pains to adjust the spam filters to allow bts mail in automatically before
ever setting the maintainer field to point to the list; I would expect other
packaging teams to take the same care.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/



Reply to: