also sprach Joe Smith <unknown_kev_cat@hotmail.com> [2006.07.01.2110 +0200]: > Actually I agree that critical is too high, grave might be reasonable, as > it causes system downtime. (System downtime is something anybody running > servers would agree is a very big problem). This discussion is about laptops, a minor details that somehow didn't register with me. :) If you upgrade your laptop over the network, I am sure you can fix the resulting problems. > "serious is a severe violation of Debian policy (roughly, it > violates a "must" or "required" directive), or, in the package > maintainer's opinion, makes the package unsuitable for release." > > The maintainer apparently agrees this is a very nasty problem, and > may very well feel that it makes the package unsuitable for > release. This sounds about right. > Of course only the package maintainer could set the package to > serious for that particular reason. I'll leave that up to you. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system before he died, rabbi zusya said: "in the world to come they will not ask me, 'why were you not moses?' they will ask me, 'why were you not zusya?'"
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)