Re: Non-DD's in debian-legal
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 10:52:45AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> writes:
>
> > However, I *do* believe that d-l is a cesspit, and I for one am very
> > glad that in its current incarnation, it is not at all binding and has
> > no value other than being a debating socity --- a debating socity that
> > I am very glad that I can avoid, thank you very much.
>
> I suspect that if it were confined to Debian developers, this problem
> would be much reduced. Not eliminated, but reduced.
Because Debian developers *never* fight amongst themselves ;-)
- David "slightly less optimistic" Nusinow
Reply to: