On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 02:04:18PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:35:41PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 12:02:16PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > > The ability to enter into a legal contract to indemnify a third party > > > > should be, and arguably IS, reserved solely for the SPI Board of > > > > Directors. > > > If SPI wish to withdraw from their relationship with Debian, then that's > > > entirely possible to arrange. I don't think it's at all proper that you > > Nobody was suggesting that, and I fail to understand why it is in > > anyone's interests for you to ratchet up the heat on this issue > > another notch by making remarks like that. > I don't understand why, as SPI President, you'd bring up concerns > regarding SPI's legal position in the middle of a thread on -devel and > -legal, without having discussed it on spi-board, having consulted SPI's > attorney as to the validity of your concerns, or having contacted me as > DPL or the archive administrators privately first, either. And hi to everyone from /.! http://linux.slashdot.org/linux/06/06/07/047204.shtml for those playing along at home. Cheers, aj
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature