Re: gcc 4.1 or not
Hi,
* Andreas Barth (aba@not.so.argh.org) [060510 23:10]:
> we think the switch to gcc 4.1
> as default should only be made if not more than 20 packages become RC
> buggy by it. Also, the switch should happen latest 1.5 months prior to
> freeze, that is Jun 15th.
As we are below the 20 packages count if bug #366820 is correct (and
Martin just confirmed the number), it is ok to do the switch now.
Martin, can you please also mark these bugs as serious now (as they're
FTBFS then)?
Thanks for the fast work and the many NMUs to all people involved - and
please continue on NMUing the remaining issues out, and then go on to
solve other RC bugs. :)
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
Reply to: