Re: Sun Java available from non-free
John Goerzen <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 05:39:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> For those playing along at home, Mike isn't a Debian developer, doesn't
>> maintain any packages, and isn't a new-maintainer applicant. He doesn't
>> even seem to be a regular participant on the debian-legal list.
> That's not even remotely relevant to the points he makes. The identity
> of the person that makes the arguments isn't relevant. The arguments
How about reading what Anthony actually replied to? Mike demanded that
the DPL perform certain actions. Suggesting that somebody actually get
involved in Debian before making demands of its leadership isn't
unreasonable. Alternatively, it could be phrased as a request.
Matthew Garrett | firstname.lastname@example.org