Le Sam 13 Mai 2006 08:45, Adrian von Bidder a écrit : > On Wednesday 10 May 2006 16:21, Daniel Schepler wrote: > > Le Mardi 09 Mai 2006 22:49, Bill Allombert a écrit : > > > Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers <debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org> > > > > ... > > > > > libkcal2b > > > libkdepim1a > > > > It looks like these two have circular dependencies because > > libkdepim depends on libkcal, while a couple of the standard > > libkcal plugins (namely kcal_kabc.so and kcal_remote.so) depend on > > libkdepim. I don't see any easy way to disentangle these. > > At least three possibilities: > > (*) most systems probably have both installed anyway, so why not > merge the packages? (Back to kdepim-libs...) those libs are used by user to develop plugins, and I'm rather not happy to see sonames disappear. The split was meant for them, that would IMHO be a significant step backward. > (*) have libkcal2b only recommend libkdepim1a > > (*) split libkcal2b into the lib and a separate libkcal-plugins > package. I do not work on kdepim directly, and I don't know really what the interdependancies between those are, and what happen if we don't have the plugins e.g. but I guess that's the direction to look at. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgpn4ijgsyBKC.pgp
Description: PGP signature