Re: gcc 4.1 or not

To: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: gcc 4.1 or not
From: Jurij Smakov <jurij@wooyd.org>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.63.0605120946020.2690@bobcat>
Reply-to: jurij@wooyd.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060511111200.GB7827@deprecation.cyrius.com>
References: <[🔎] 20060510211048.GJ11995@mails.so.argh.org> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.63.0605102345470.3933@bobcat> <[🔎] 20060511111200.GB7827@deprecation.cyrius.com>

On Thu, 11 May 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote:

I didn't hit this problem myself yet, but it has been mentioned on
sparclinux list that 4.1 currently miscompiles the sparc kernel.


Do you know if this still happens, and if so, whether someone has
tracked it down?

I only became aware of it a couple of days ago, and will try to reproducethe problem during the weekend.


Best regards,

Jurij Smakov                                        jurij@wooyd.org
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/                   KeyID: C99E03CC

Reply to:

References:
- gcc 4.1 or not
  - From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Re: gcc 4.1 or not
  - From: Jurij Smakov <jurij@wooyd.org>
- Re: gcc 4.1 or not
  - From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Possible transition to GCC 4.1 for etch: coordinated NMUs
Next by Date: [VAC] Broke my wrist, afk 3-6 weeks
Previous by thread: Re: gcc 4.1 or not
Next by thread: Re: gcc 4.1 or not
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread