Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main (was: Bug#353277: should be in contrib)
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:40:26AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> I'll ask again: Is the purpose of ndiswrapper running non-free drivers? If it
> isn't, show me a free, non-toy, non-POC driver that would prove otherwise.
Does the lack of a free driver which can be used with ndiswrapper mean
that it is impossible to use ndiswrapper with such a free driver, should
one eventually be written?
If there is a brand shiny new file format of which the spec has been
fully disclosed and published in an RFC, though no free editors exist
(yet) for the format, does that make the format non-free?
Fun will now commence
-- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4