Re: A bit of experience after having updated some packages to use pbuilder-test testsuite engine.

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: pbuilder-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: A bit of experience after having updated some packages to use pbuilder-test testsuite engine.
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:10:20 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 2flvewdj3hv.fsf@saruman.uio.no>
References: <1135123651.5624.63.camel@esme.liw.iki.fi> <[🔎] 87wth36rsl.dancerj%dancer@netfort.gr.jp> <[🔎] 87oe28mham.dancerj%dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

[Junichi Uekawa]
> 3. support for X. Some of my packages are command-line console tools,
>    but many are actually graphical apps. It would be a plus to have
>    some kind of interactive/noninteractive X-based testing.

Would xnee do the trick?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A bit of experience after having updated some packages to use pbuilder-test testsuite engine.
  - From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

References:
- pbuilder testsuite support (Re: Thoughts on Debian quality, including automated testing)
  - From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
- A bit of experience after having updated some packages to use pbuilder-test testsuite engine.
  - From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

Prev by Date: Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu
Next by Date: Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
Previous by thread: A bit of experience after having updated some packages to use pbuilder-test testsuite engine.
Next by thread: Re: A bit of experience after having updated some packages to use pbuilder-test testsuite engine.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread