* Mike Hommey (mh@glandium.org) wrote: > There have been 2 NMUs on libxml2 in a week and I never got a message > beforehand. Now I wonder if that practice has disappeared somehow. > > I admit I've not spent enough time for libxml2 recently, but still, I > wouldn't have been bothered by some poking beforehand. > > Moreover, I'm not exactly sure the second NMU has indeed removed all > problematic content but the bug is closed, so the NMUer may be happy. > Ah, by the way, the bug was not even a problem for package propagation > to testing, so that doesn't make the propagation an argument for a quick > upload. > > No thanks > > Mike > > To quote Andreas Barth: > However, we need to start *now* to give the RC-bug count some more > attention. This means also that we're going to start again an > everlasting BSP: For RC-bugs, you can upload 0-days NMUs for RC-bugs > open for more than one week. However, you are still required to > notify the maintainer via BTS before uploading. And of course, you > need to take care of anything you broke by your NMU. So if they didn't notify you through the BTS and/or the bugs were open for less than a week, then let the chastisement commence! -- Eric Dorland <eric@kuroneko.ca> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: hooty@jabber.com 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature