Re: replacing sysklogd
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi Nathanael!
> You wrote:
>>284914 -- trivial bug in klogd.
>> I still say we switch to another syslogd implementation and remove
>> sysklogd entirely. It's got 4 RC bugs and 99 bugs total, including 34
>> patches. Effectively, it's unmaintained, but Joey hasn't orphaned it.
>> It's a sloppy, screwy codebase, so I can understand if Joey doesn't want
>> to fix it. I've been using syslog-ng happily for several years now,
>> but metalog seems to be a reasonable alternative as well.
> Well, I personally have never had much problems with sysklogd, but I
> agree that syslog-ng is a lot nicer. I didn't know that it is
> unmaintained upstream though.
> What are other distributions using?
I don't know what other distribution uses. I use metalog wherever I have
jak to dobrze, że są oceany - bez nich byłoby jeszcze smutniej