Re: Experiment: poll on "switching to vim-tiny for standard vi?"

[Steve Greenland <steveg@moregruel.net>]

On 23-Dec-05, 11:54 (CST), Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote: 

> The size of base matters a little, but it's not an "every byte is
> sacred" situation.
>
> Cheers, aj (base maintainer, for those playing along at home)

Anthony: 

So, it seems that so far as Stefano (vim maintainer) and I (nvi
maintainer) are concerned, you and Joey get to make the call on this. Since
Joey initiated this thread, I think we can assume he's in favor of
the change. How say you?

If you agree with the change, do Stefano and I need to do anything
other than swap vi alternative priorities and swap important<->optional
priorities?


Steve

-- 
Steve Greenland
    The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable operating
    system and Linus Torvalds claims to be trying to take over the
    world.       -- seen on the net