MJ Ray wrote: > The increase is between 101% for ia64 and 58% for i386. > vim-tiny+vim-common is smallish by current standards, but > neither "about the same" as nvi, nor "only marginally larger". > Was there a maths error near the top of this thread? The very top of this thread contained a forwarded message containing the text "(776 + 232 on i386)". If you're trying to imply some sort of error it might help if you pointed to a message-id. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature