Re: buildd administration
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> Generally, experimental fits the above role. Unstable's for uploading new
> development of packages that will hopefully work, but might turn out not
> to. In particular, though, they need to be fixed pretty quickly -- six
> months in experimental, and another two so far in unstable isn't quickly.
So can you explain for me when this policy change was made and where
it was announced? I must have missed it. I refer specifically to the
statement that if a package in unstable does not work, in needs to be
fixed "pretty quickly".
Reply to: