Re: ldd -u (Re: Solving recursive dependency disease in KDE-based packages)
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 05:02:15PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 04:56:08PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > * Nathanael Nerode [Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:35:41 -0500]:
> > > To work out which libraries you're linked to which you don't actually need,
> > > ldd -u <executable or library> is invaluable.
> > This seems like not the case _at all_ to me (the "invaluable" bit):
> > % ldd -u /usr/lib/amarok/amarokapp
> > Unused direct dependencies:
> ldd -u /usr/lib/amarok/amarokapp
> ldd: unrecognized option `-u'
> Try `ldd --help' for more information.
> This atleast doesn't even seem to work on all arches either.
So that seems to be caused by having ia32-libs installed, which
still has an older glibc version.