Re: State of gcc 2.95 use in Debian unstable
Heiko Müller <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> We found that gcc-2.95 -Os produces object code of acceptable quality
> within reasonable compilation times. gcc >=3 is less efficient w.r.t.
> compilation time and memory consumption and in many cases even fails
> to compile our codes due to the very long expressions. The C/C++ codes
> generated from the computer algebra software are perhaps unusual but
> not broken.
Can you send in a few (hopefully short) examples that fail as
There is probably nothing to do about compile time and memory
consuption but it should at least work. Maybe the compiled result is