Re: Secret changes for binNMUs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Michael Banck <email@example.com> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 11:02:36AM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> Goswin von Brederlow <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> > If you NEED to do a manual binNMU it is probably best to use sbuild
>> > (the cvs, not deb)
>> Which sbuild CVS repo?
> It is a SVN repo now, the one used by the buildd infrastructure.
Thanks, I'm going through the changes now.
>> BTW, are there any good reasons why the autobuilders don't use the
>> packaged version anywat? The differences are minimal.
> Last time I looked the changes seemed to be pretty big, but merging is
> of course a mid-term goal.
I started merging the changes tonight, and I'll try to get through
some more tomorrow. Some of the changes appear to be dysfunctional,
so I'm testing as I go along.
Once the current SVN changes are merged, I'll reindent the source to
match the 4 col SVN intentation, re-diff it and manually merge any
outstanding changes. Once we are done, I'll see if we can push back
the changes we've made to make it more user-friendly. Is there a
mailing list for "upstream" to send patches to?
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----