On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 11:38:45AM -0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thursday, November 24, 2005 11:17 AM, Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> > wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 02:11:45PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > [...] > >> On that score, the description for d-d-c says that it includes > >> buildd logs, > > > > Then that description is wrong. It never did include buildd logs, and > > AFAIK, there are no plans to that effect, either. > > It doesn't say that. > > It says: > > "Notices about uploaded packages for the unstable distribution, from > developers, buildds and katie, the archive sentinel." > > i.e. the only e-mails from buildds involved are "notices about uploaded > packages", not logs. Sorry, that was a massive typo on my part. I thought "buildd output", and wrote "buildd logs" when I meant "buildd .changes files". My question, as amended, though, still holds -- are the .changes associated with the upload of autobuilt packages supposed to go to d-d-c, and if so, are they there and I'm just not seeing them in the list archive? - Matt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature