Re: [Help] How to fix a buggy prerm script in sarge?
it seems that just reading the policy again sometimes solves a problem...
Frank Küster <email@example.com> wrote:
> Daniel Burrows <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:25:01PM +0100, Frank Küster <email@example.com> was heard to say:
>>> we just received a bug report that is caused by a buggy prerm script
>>> in the package in sarge (it fails because it doesn't handle read-only
>>> /usr/local properly). Is there any way to fix this, except documenting
>>> it in the release notes?
>> If your old prerm fails, the new prerm should be called with
>> "failed-upgrade" as its first argument (see Policy 6.4 and 6.5),
>> so you can do any necessary workarounds there. Errors in postrm
>> are handled similarly.
> But what would be the "necessary workarounds"? The offending lines are:
> rm -f $LOCALTEXMF/ls-R
> rmdir $LOCALTEXMF 2>/dev/null || true
I was under the impression that "new-prerm failed-upgrade" was called
only to clean up after the failing old prerm script. But rereading 6.5,
I understand that the new prerm is called as a replacement for the
failed old prerm, and if it succeeds, the upgrade can proceed without
problems. Am I right?
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich