Hello,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 07:04:02PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> There were also some bugs for tetex-* that were never sent to the
> Maintainer: field, namely the debian-tetex-maint mailing list.
Here is another one. The following message (related to bug #335689)
spend six days in the vincinity of master.
Received: from master.debian.org (master.debian.org [146.82.138.7])
by dd1234.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 391E91752C5
for <voss@seehuhn.de>; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 05:21:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1EWRAJ-00020H-00; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 22:20:59 -0600
Received: from spohr.debian.org [140.211.166.43] by master.debian.org with
esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1EUQ6i-0000Rb-00; Tue, 25 Oct 2005
09:48:56 -0500
Received: from debbugs by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1
(Debian)) id 1EUQ6e-0004x2-00; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 07:48:52 -0700
Message-Id: <200510251211.46709.lawrencewilliams@nl.rogers.com>
I hope this helps,
Jochen
--
http://seehuhn.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature