Re: Packages that need to be rebuilt agaisnt libssl0.9.8
On Sat, 08 Oct 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I have a better idea, then; how about if they just never have new major
> versions of libpng, ever again? The last two soname changes were in fact
> total bullshit, and judging by past events I can see them using symbol
Or, for something that has a modicum of chance of png upstream accepting,
why not telling us (d-devel) about a supposed upcoming version change a week
before they release it, so that we can tell them they are smoking crack and
fix the error before it hits the wild if that's the case?
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
Reply to: