On Saturday 08 October 2005 22:38, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Disgustingly, I worked out that we could have revived real i386 support > for etch thanks to changes in gcc-3.4 and gcc-4.0 which nobody bothered > to advertise. But it's too late now, since everything is built with > arch=i486. :-P Do you mean that the security-flawed kernel patch would not have been needed?
Attachment:
pgp0BI0_YZYRx.pgp
Description: PGP signature