Re: #debian-tech@OFTC: port "qualification declarations" for etch

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: #debian-tech@OFTC: port "qualification declarations" for etch
From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org (va, manoj)>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 08:27:49 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 87fyrg2iwa.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <20051005104944.GA30263@tennyson.dodds.net> (Steve Langasek's message of "Wed, 5 Oct 2005 03:49:44 -0700")
References: <20051005104944.GA30263@tennyson.dodds.net>

Hi,

        Are there provisions for such a discussion on some other forum
 as well?  I mean, there are people who can't be on IRC, and others
 who have a principled objection to the charter of the channel
 selected. Is there a preferred mechanism or mailing list where input
 from such individuals is solicited?

        manoj
-- 
QOTD: "She's about as smart as bait."
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: #debian-tech@OFTC: port "qualification declarations" for etch
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: New XTerm package, independent from X.Org, in experimental.
Next by Date: Re: New XTerm package, independent from X.Org, in experimental.
Previous by thread: Re: #debian-tech@OFTC: port "qualification declarations" for etch
Next by thread: Re: #debian-tech@OFTC: port "qualification declarations" for etch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread