Re: ATTN openofficeorg developers

To: Martin <martin@martinpower.com>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ATTN openofficeorg developers
From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 07:18:43 +0200 (CEST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.62.0509280716260.20205@wr-linux02>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200509271841.32181.martin@martinpower.com>
References: <[🔎] 200509271841.32181.martin@martinpower.com>

On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Martin wrote:

	I know you want to scold me because this is not a formal bug report.  I find
that form overwhelming.


What form?  Do you know reportbug?
Your chances to reach the relevant people are drastically higher if you file
a bug report against the package in question than posting quite unspecific
mails to Debian devel.

	Last week I reported a problem with gnumeric on kde on testing.  Are these
problems related?


Probably not and I posted at least a workaround for this problem.

Kind regards

         Andreas.

--
http://fam-tille.de

Reply to:

References:
- ATTN openofficeorg developers
  - From: Martin <martin@martinpower.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Patch²: Maintaining a patch for a debian package
Next by Date: Re: libpng10(/2) gone, [gdk-]imlib1 and GNOME 1 going -- check yourpackages
Previous by thread: ATTN openofficeorg developers
Next by thread: Re: ATTN openofficeorg developers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread