Re: gdk-imlib1 may yet live (was Re: Removing GNOME 1 (was Re: orbit2cpp
Nathanael Nerode <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Steve Langasek wrote (in reference to gdk-imlib1):
>>No, there isn't. It should only need to be rebuilt against the newer
> Ah, excellent news. Why wasn't this done *before* removing libpng10?
> Because the imlib package maintainer is dropping them and nobody else
> understood the state of the imlib packages? (I certainly find it very
> In any case that should be done soon. Someone who cares needs to make some
> sort of upload for the imlib packages.
I was under the mistaken impression that imlib was maintained, and
imlib+png2 was in RFA status. But it turns I was wrong; both are
RFA. So I will adopt imlib, have it build gdk_imlib too, upload, and
maybe all this can be straightened out.