On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 00:52 +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Lars Bahner <email@example.com> [2005.08.18.2346 +0200]: > > Please CC: me as I am not on this list! > > Please consider setting Mail-Followup-To accordingly. > > > Upstream names the betas for 0.7.3.3 as 0.7.3.3.b1-b30 - as you no > > doubt already guessed. > > This is why we now have the ~ operator. > > > So now that there is no beta-versioning, the installer sees this > > as a lower number. I could of cource number the package as > > 0.7.3.3.c or 0.7.3.3.final, but I was wondering what The Right > > Thing To Do would be. > > I think you have to resort to an epoch. Using 0.7.3.3.final seems > okay to me too. I don't think there is a Right Way. I think the ~ is the Right Way. 0.7.3.3~b1 < 0.7.3.3~b30 < 0.7.3.3 Cheers, Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part