Re: README - confusing, irrelevant, redundant, useless

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: README - confusing, irrelevant, redundant, useless
From: "W. Borgert" <debacle@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 06:05:40 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050815060540.GA22041@k6.in-berlin.de>
Reply-to: debacle@debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87u0hskq74.fsf@kreon.lan.henning.makholm.net>
References: <[🔎] 20050814120236.GA14365@k6.in-berlin.de> <[🔎] 42FF776F.3070804@dlgeek.net> <[🔎] 1124062927.22066.105.camel@sanctuary.edennet> <[🔎] 87u0hskq74.fsf@kreon.lan.henning.makholm.net>

On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 02:18:39AM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
...a lot of wise things...

I have to agree.  So how to proceed?  File minor bugs against
README files, that contain predominantly useless information?

Cheers,
-- 
W. Borgert <debacle@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~debacle/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: README - confusing, irrelevant, redundant, useless
  - From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>

References:
- README - confusing, irrelevant, redundant, useless
  - From: "W. Borgert" <debacle@debian.org>
- Re: README - confusing, irrelevant, redundant, useless
  - From: Benjamin Seidenberg <astronut@dlgeek.net>
- Re: README - confusing, irrelevant, redundant, useless
  - From: Ben Armstrong <synrg@sanctuary.nslug.ns.ca>
- Re: README - confusing, irrelevant, redundant, useless
  - From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance
Next by Date: Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance
Previous by thread: Re: README - confusing, irrelevant, redundant, useless
Next by thread: Re: README - confusing, irrelevant, redundant, useless
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread