Re: experimental bugs preventing testing transition?
On 10/08/05, Colin Watson <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:15:13PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> > #320980: tetex-bin: Updmap error because a map file has not been found
> > Package: tetex-bin (tetex-bin 3.0-5.0.sarge1); Severity: serious; Reported by...
> > but 3.0-5 is in experimental (3.0-5.0.sarge1 is a binary-only-backport I
> > made), and the package trying to enter testing is 2.0.2-31.
> > Is this a bug in Björns script, or in the new versioned BTS, or in
> > katie's code?
> Testing and BTS version tracking haven't been updated to play properly
> together yet.
If i'm not mistaken, you could tag the bug etch, of course, this is a
very nasty/dirty way of getting the RC-free package actually in
testing, but IIRC until the program that manages testing knows about
versioned BTS, it would work for experimental, the other option is to
just tag the bug experimental and that should work as well, (on second
thoughts that latter would be extremely more perfered over the
> Colin Watson [email@example.com]
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org
Proud Debian & FOSS User
Debian Maintainer of: html2ps, ipkungfu, dvorak7min & windowlab