Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?
* W. Borgert <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2005-07-20 18:08]:
> what do you think about the usefulness of technical (and other
> strange) details in package description? I think, those are
> annoying and should be avoided, but maybe I can learn, why they
> are useful. Examples:
> "Foo is a Perl-based program that..."
> "libBar is written in C..."
I think one reason could be that some poeple would rather
install a programm in a language they know and they are able
to debug. Just a guess.
I don't think this would justify a bug report. Maybe
wishlist for a better control description but in general it
is only further information...
Nico Golde - JAB: email@example.com | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org
VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps
and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred