On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 03:19:54PM -0400, sean finney wrote: > On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 09:04:57PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > Why not building curl --without-sssl and --with-gnutls=/usr? Maybe a > > NMU? > > this is definitely NOT a reason to NMU libcurl. remember that it is > your package that is "broken". of course you could still file a > wishlist bug against libcurl asking to compile against gnutls > instead, but it's up to the maintainer in question to decide. oh, many thanks for the stop :) i saw the bug report, i'm sorry to not have commented the request which i find absolutely reasonable. i'll try to figure out if curl may suffer from limitations due to the use of gnutls in place of openssl. i doubt seriously a new package like libcurl3-gnutls is appropriate, but let me know your opinion. is this stuff urgent? cheers domenico -----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok --[ http://people.debian.org/~cavok/gpgkey.asc ---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature