On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 05:01:03PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > The aspell dictionary packages build-depend on aspell-bin (>> 0.60). > > aspell-bin is now a virtual package provided by aspell, but virtual > > packages cannot be versioned, so these build-dependency cannot be > > satisfied. > > > > There are fifteen such packages: > > I'd see a benefit in filing mail beforehand for a change, but > after-the-fact, I have an impression that it's better to > file bugs on the packages since it's easier to track the problem that way. > > Unless there is a chance of reintroducing aspell-bin package, > that should probably be the case. > > I think this is the call of aspell maintainer. Brian, are you planning to reintroduce the aspell-bin package or should I file bugs against the packages that fail to build? -- Matt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature