Re: packages.d.o mail (Re: Greylisting for @debian.org email, please)
* Adeodato Simó (firstname.lastname@example.org) [050623 16:50]:
> * Andreas Barth [Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:54:29 +0200]:
> > The packages.d.o-addresses are a really useful tool for contacting
> > multiple maintainers e.g. for transitions. They were quite helpful
> > during e.g. the release of sarge.
> There are plans to merge @packages.d.o and @packages.QA.d.o, so that
> both reach the maintainer and the PTS subscribers. The QA address
> requires the presence of an X-PTS-Approved header to let a message
> reach <package>@p.q.d.o, but I never asked Frank what his plans about
> this wrt the merge were.
> If @packages.d.o addresses are really such a big source of spam, we
> could require the header for both domains, which isn't _that_
> disruptive if we assume most users of @p.d.o addresses are developers,
> and not end users.
Well, that would work for me, yes.