Re: Greylisting for @debian.org email, please
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 01:46, Thomas Bushnell BSG <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Russell Coker <email@example.com> writes:
> > You could help by listing the anti-spam measures that you consider to be
> > acceptable. Rejecting every suggestion for an improvement is not
> > helpful.
> I am ok with anti-spam measures which enable a well-behaving false
> positive sender to know they have run afoul, and in which the
> maintainers of the mechanism promise to try and adjust the system so
> that the false-positive in question doesn't recur, taking
> responsibility for false positives.
So the CBL is fine then.
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page