Re: And now for something completely different... etch!
Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 02:14:45PM -0300, Humberto Massa Guimarães wrote:
>
>> (1) LSB -- which Debian's policy vows to follow -- mandates the
>> default differentiated runlevels.
>
> No. Please read
> <http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_2.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/runlevels.html>.
Given that they *suggest* a set of runlevels, which provides "one spare for
local config", would it be out of order for users to file wishlist bugs
on packages not following these guidelines?
cheers, Rich.
--
rich walker | Shadow Robot Company | rw@shadow.org.uk
technical director 251 Liverpool Road |
need a Hand? London N1 1LX | +UK 20 7700 2487
www.shadow.org.uk/products/newhand.shtml
Reply to: