* Julien BLACHE (jblache@debian.org) wrote: > Eric Dorland <eric@debian.org> wrote: > > > Now, the Mozilla Foundation is willing to give us permission to use > > the marks, but only to Debian specifically. To me, this feels like a > > violation (at least in spirit) of DFSG #8. It's now nearly six months > > I'd say that it is a clear violation of the DFSG, not only in spirit. > > > So for hopefully the last time I'd like to get people's opinion on > > this before I take any action. Am I being too pedantic? I'd also love > > to hear how Ubuntu is handling this (not to fan the flames, just to > > get a different perspective). > > The Debian Way (tm) would be to drop mozilla, firefox and thunderbird > from Debian -- there's no reason what works with the FSF can't work > with the MoFo. Don't be so militant. Firefox is clearly a popular and useful program. There's no reason to be so extreme. > By the way, what is the status wrt OpenOffice.org, which has the same > kind of issue ? I'm not sure, I don't think the issues are entirely the same. -- Eric Dorland <eric.dorland@mail.mcgill.ca> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: hooty@jabber.com 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature