On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 11:54:08AM +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:12:04AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > - sparc: one buildd which is not consistently able to keep up with the > > volume of incoming packages; no backup buildd, no additional porter > > machine. > how powerfull would a machine need to be to be of any help here? would > an ultra 10 or a netra x1 be sufficient? The current buildd is an UltraSPARC II 300MHz with 512MB of RAM, and is not sufficient. I don't know enough about Sparc benchmarks to know whether the machines you mention are sufficient. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature