On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 06:13:10AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > In article <[🔎] 20050607091204.GA7046@mauritius.dodds.net> vorlon@debian.org writes: > >- sparc: one buildd which is not consistently able to keep up with the > > volume of incoming packages; no backup buildd, no additional porter > > machine. > Second faster machine has been down, reportedly with disk problems. Hardware flaw. (RAID array can only be reinitialized from Solaris.) > Even faster replacement machine (with more redunancy) has been > offered. Apparently waiting coordination between doner (who is a DD) > and Debian System Admin team. The offer in question is to take us down to *zero* build machines, and then, if everything goes right, replace it with an SMP system that would pass for two. > Offers of an addional buildd have been refused. Offers of addional > hardware have been ignored or refused. Refused, or not acknowledged? If they were refused, what reason was given? If they weren't acknowledged, that's inconclusive; these guys get a lot of mail that has to be sorted through, and there also seems to be some mail that never gets sent to the right place. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature