* Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton (lkcl@lkcl.net) wrote: > any progress on making libselinux1 a "Required" package? > > the possibility of having debian/selinux is totally dependent > on this one thing happening. > > no libselinux1="Required", no debian/selinux [all dependent packages > e.g. coreutils will be "policy violations"]. Uhhh, it's the other way around. Get coreutils to Depend on libselinux1 and it'll be brought up to Required. You don't get the library "Required" first, having a library be "Required" but nothing "Required" actually depending on it is senseless. Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature