Hey Adeodato, Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2005, 04:29 +0200 schrieb Adeodato Simó: > but on the > packaging side they work as closely as possible: common VCS repository > and whatever. This sounds really cool. > specially for non-experienced packagers, doesn't help here > either (correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that getting a sponsored > upload to universe happens faster and more easily than a sponsored > upload to sid). We get those people there. Our NEW packages policy states that every completely new package has to be reviewed by at least 3 maintainers or MOTUs. The packages in question are in a pretty good state and the MOTU hopefuls work incredibly hard to get into it. > - an ITP is filed if they intend to search a for a Debian sponsor > and maintain the Debian package themselves, otherwise a RFP is > submitted To be honest, I wasn't that familiar with the Debian administrative devices, but if these measures help in any way, I will discuss it in the MOTUMeeting ( http://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTUMeeting ). > (*) Or a generic label could be used, e.g. "[from-derived-dist]". Yeah, why not. Have a nice day, Daniel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part