Re: Is Ubuntu a debian derivative or is it a fork?
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 12:32:14AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> occasions that their patch policy is less than optimal. While some
> personally agree with me, it's their policy and unfortunately it won't
> change... however, maybe there's still hope, now that more people are
Has there been any explanation for the policy? I'm having a hard time
thinking of any sensible reasoning.
Obviously there's no problem with posting the patches on the web and
including a pointer to them, or doing that if the patch is particularly
enormous. It's just insisting on doing it all the time but regardless
of what usptream want that seems odd.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
Reply to: