Re: RES: /usr/lib vs /usr/libexec
Brian May <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Bushnell BSG <email@example.com> writes:
> Thomas> We've been told that /usr is necessary to allow network
> Thomas> sharing. Of course, you can network share any directory,
> Thomas> not just /usr. If you want executables to be shared, then
> Thomas> share /bin. It's not a problem. I've done it.
> If you want to share /bin, how do you run /bin/mount in order to mount
/bin/mount foo:whatever /bin
Just because you mount something on top of /bin does not require it to
have been empty before.
Same for /lib.