Re: removing ipfwadm

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>]

On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 09:49:01AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote:

> I am not sure whether the ipfwadm package should be removed.  Kernels up to
> 2.4 still have support for ipfwadm filtering rules, so theoretically people
> could still be using it with current kernels.
> 
> cc'ing debian-devel.  If the consensus there is that the package should be
> removed, I'll request its removal.

_All_ kernel versions in sarge support ipfwadm.

Not that I expect many people to use it, but I don't see a good reason 
for removing it.

> --Adam

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed