Re: distributed batch processing

To: Paul Brossier <piem@altern.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: distributed batch processing
From: Tim Cutts <timc@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 00:58:02 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 2d4156d57a0f8f40b1350b1e51635858@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050513130511.GA9845@localhost>
References: <[🔎] 20050510000528.GA19858@localhost> <[🔎] ccc0ab658ce0879fc5080c1a3f8b8a25@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <[🔎] 20050513130511.GA9845@localhost>


On 13 May 2005, at 2:05 pm, Paul Brossier wrote:

queue *is* in woody, and is planned to go in sarge as it is. i willbump
the severity of the bug i reported to serious.

It must have made it back in eventually then - it got pulled at onestage because it did very nasty things to /dev/tty:


http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=56931&archive=yes

Tim

--
Dr Tim Cutts
GPG: 1024/D FC81E159 5BA6 8CD4 2C57 9824 6638  C066 16E2 F4F5 FC81 E159

Reply to:

References:
- distributed batch processing
  - From: Paul Brossier <piem-lists@altern.org>
- Re: distributed batch processing
  - From: Tim Cutts <timc@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: distributed batch processing
  - From: Paul Brossier <piem@altern.org>

Prev by Date: Some Things 2 Get Before U Go To Vegas
Next by Date: lost some mails
Previous by thread: Re: distributed batch processing
Next by thread: Re: distributed batch processing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread